After predicting a landslide against Trump and getting a 10% increase in his vote as well as a reduction in the Demcrat majority in the House, the mainstream media has now officially given up on Trump voters.
Trump disputing the election and challenging it in the Courts (as announced in advance and expected) is being described as a fundamental assault on democracy.
In fact it is so outrageous for a candidate to dispute the results of an election and go to Court that his “baseless” claims must not even be reported.
This stuff should not be surprising from the people that reacted to Trump’s original election by denouncing him as a Kremlin agent and demanding that the intelligence agencies summarily remove him in a coup d’etat.
That went on for literally years, but the same clowns seem to imagine soothing platitudes about “healing” are going to prevent large numbers of people who voted against the swamp remaining hostile to it.
Here’s an explanation of the grave responsibility the media has taken on itself to protect the American people from Trump’s “baseless claims”.
Here’s a good rendition of the way the adoring media has portrayed the new healer:
And with that, Donald Trump suddenly seemed like yesterday’s news.
The appearance of Joe Biden as president-elect flanked by his vice-president Kamala Harris has immediately swept away the Trump years.
Not that Trump disappears or that his followers no longer matter — they do as much as ever — but the spell has been broken.
Donald Trump alone with his petulance and lies now looks small, like the Wizard of Oz — just a little man behind a big microphone.
Biden, dismissed by many — the man who had failed in two previous presidential campaigns — now looked and sounded presidential.
In Kamala Harris — the first female vice-president, African-American and the daughter of an Indian immigrant — Biden announces the next generation of the Democratic Party.
Moments matter and this was a moment: an historic moment.
Words matter, and these were words of healing and unity.
They are just platitudes but they are what a battered country needs to hear right now.
Stan Grant goes on to say that the platitudes the media thinks “a battered country needs to hear right now” are unlikely to work.
Another surprisingly perceptive article from the same ABC journalist is here:
Both are well worth reading in full.
So is the full text of the platitudes from Biden and Harris.
The 76 million who voted Democrat are congratulated because:
“You chose hope and unity, decency, science and, yes, truth”.
As for the 70 million hopeless, disruptive, indecent, irrational liars who did not make that choice, it seems unlikely that they will be as impressed by the healing platitudes about unity.
We are again at a turning point that makes it impossible to predict how things will develop.
I still see no signs of a left emerging. But there is an opening for a movement that really does unite people against the populist demagogues on both sides.
I don’t claim to have much understanding of how things are developing in Australia, let alone America.
I won’t try to respond in detail to the points made here.
I don’t believe either the Universities or media were ever oriented towards telling the truth, nor that they have recently been taken over by some alien force antithetical to their previous orientation.
I think corporate liberals are just continuing to be corporate liberals.
Its just that this is becoming increasingly ridiculous.
A movement that expressed the same disgust that corporate liberals have for celebrity con artists like Trump and that Trumpists have for the corporate liberals should be able to form a very broad united front.
What’s still missing though is an actual program as to how things should be changed.
There are pressing issues in the USA that will come to a head quickly.
Biden has announced a task force to prepare an action plan to deal with both covid-19 and its economic consequences immediately on taking office on 20 January.
The epidemic will be much worse by 20 January. It would make sense to start implementing that plan immediately in Democrat States willing to accept his leadership and declare martial law and a national lockdown on taking office. But I would be surprised if that happened. I haven’t seen any sign of Biden proposing a lockdown at all.
Instead I expect that Trump will not be a “lame duck” President until January 20, but more like a “wounded bull”.
Majority control of the Senate will be determined by the outcome of two runoff Senate elections in Georgia, on January 5. The next day a joint session of both Houses presided over by Vice-President Pence meets to count and finalize the Electoral College results. That is the day the election results get finalized, not when the media “calls” them. If any disputes have not been settled by December 8 they may end up fought over then, during the height of an epidemic wave.
If all goes unexpectedly smoothly we will either be back to the usual Washington gridlock in which President Biden can blame the Senate for his inability to do anything just as Obama did for 8 years with Biden as his Vice-President. Or else Democrats do get both Houses and the Republicans and pseudo-left Democrats can blame Biden for his inability to do anything despite having control of both Houses and the Executive.
I would expect either of those to be an optimum situation for Trump, who will do far better posturing against the swamp from opposition than as President. I expect that Trumpists will still dominate the Republican primaries and could be swept back to a majority in the mid-terms if the platitudes continue as I expect they will.
It is all far too complex and murky to predict as opposed to just having vague “expectations”.
But for the record, I do predict that the Supreme Court will declare the Pennsylvania ballots that arrived after election day invalid. I haven’t seen any evidence either supporting or rebutting media claims that this won’t effect the result. If the numbers are as small as they say and if they were kept separate from the other ballots as ordered and as claimed, the court would not have an excuse to invalidate enough Democrat votes to affect the result.
But I would not assume the media claims are correct about that any more than I would be surprised at the rather notorious party machines in Democrat run cities encouraging voters dead or alive to vote often as well as early.
It is after all the plain duty of every red blooded American to do whatever it takes to prevent the monstrous Trump from continuing to pollute the White House. So why on earth would Democrat officials faced with the danger of a racist, fascist Kremlin stooge again disrupting national unity NOT rig the election, if they could?
The judgment I expect will be based on the Supreme Court reaffirming the well established principle that State legislatures have plenary power over Federal elections.
I do not expect that the Republican legislatures and Governors in Arizona and Georgia might take the opportunity to exercise that plenary power and decide to choose the State’s electors themselves and so reverse the results.
But the monotonous bleating from the media about how unpatriotic and undemocratic it is to dispute the media’s announcement of who won, suggests they are very worried indeed about something.
They are usually wrong but one cannot assume that they are always wrong.
Hi Arthur I was wondering if you could do me a favour. Im having an argument with a friend who Ive been arguing with for over 50 years (why stop now). Im arguing that the seriously misguided US withdrawal from Afghanistan will not provoke a regional war. In the debate where you and Jim Molan were participating you stated that a US withdrawal would provoke a regional war. Now my friend is arguing that because Taliban troops have recently crossed the border this conflict now constitutes a regional war. Seeing that the argument was provoked by your assertion that regional war would follow withdrawal I thought it could be useful to ask you is there currently a regional war going on.
I am not currently following events in Afghanistan. My impression is that the Taliban is currently occupying cities once held by the “Northern Alliance” of Tajik, Uzbek and Turkmen warlords before taking Kabul from its southern Pushton base, presumably to cut off Kabul forces from retreating to the North. I would not expect that to end the Afghan civil war and I would not expect neigbouring countries to remain uninvolved.
Only the “usual suspects” who I am not inclined to do favours for could hold out the fantasy hope that withdrawal of US forces would result in peace.
Just a clarification. On another site in 2009 you accused me of supporting a military withdrawal from Afghanistan. I immediately informed you that I had never supported withdrawal as I thought then as I do now that withdrawal would be a total act of bastardry. (the anti war movement split over this question and I was for troops remaining)
Thank you for your earlier reply.